header image
Jul 31

A recent paper (freely available at PLOS one) is reporting how relaxation response (RR) (a form of meditation) changed whole blood gene expression.

In the introduction they report previous research that found that meditation decreases oxygen consumption, reduced blood pressure, heart rate, and respiration. The current paper wanted to look at more the underlying molecular changes that bring about the above physiological responses and the many other positive benefits reported with meditation. Now it would have been nice to examine genes that changed in the brain but that is not possible in live humans (for multiple genes) so they instead look at changes in the blood. There were three groups: control, short term practitioners of RR (8 weeks), and long term practitioners.

2,209 differentially expressed genes were reported when comparing long term RR subjects and controls. Even the short term RR subjects displayed 1,561 differentially expressed genes compared to controls. Additionally, of the 2,2209 and 1,561 gene changes in the meditation groups 433 were common between the two groups.

When they tried to bunch these gene changes into common pathway groups they observed alteration in cellular metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, generation of free oxygen species, and response to oxidative stress.

We hypothesize that RR elicitation is associated with systemic gene
expression changes in molecular and biochemical pathways
involved in cellular metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation/
generation of reactive oxygen species and response to oxidative
stress and that these changes to some degree serve to ameliorate
the negative impact of stress.

Now of course like most other studies they are not really answering mechanistic questions with this study but it does offer further support that meditation is not just changing ‘feelings’ but is doing something at the molecular level.

They further discuss a previous paper that examined gene changes with the meditative technique of  Qi Qong.

Overall, similar genomic pattern changes occurred in practitioners
of a specific mind body technique (Qi Gong) as well as in
our long-term practitioners who utilized different RR practices
including Vipassna, mantra, mindfulness or transcendental
meditation, breath focus, Kripalu or Kundalini Yoga, and
repetitive prayer. This indicates there is a common RR state
regardless of the techniques used to elicit it.

What I found most interesting about the study is that 8 weeks of practice of this meditative technique resulted in similar gene changes (at least in the same direction) as the long term practitioners. This makes it more assessable to the masses, you do not have to be a long term practitioner to get results (you don’t have to go up in the mountains and learn from a guru for several years).

One reader had commented that researchers should test more Chinese/alternative medicine so here is one example. I have two friends that have recently taken up meditation and find it effective in everything from general reduction of stress to sports performance. I have many more friends that have started the practice of yoga, and in the discussion session of the paper the authors specifically mention  Kripalu or Kundalini Yoga. Now I know there are many different types of yoga and I am curious about the two forms they specifically mentioned. I have not done meditation since I was 12 years old it may be time I start again.

Say you don’t for whatever reason enjoy traditional exercise programs which I am always promoting then try meditation. It offers many of the same benefits but also maybe some additional ones. Or even better do both traditional exercises and a meditation technique.

Zemanta Pixie

Jul 29

A new study is predicting that 86 % of Americans could be overweight by 2030, if current trends continue. Among the population 51.1 % are projected to be obese. Health care costs due to the overweight would be 16 - 18 % of the total health care costs (via John Hopkins Bloomberg school of public health, and Wired). I have covered the growing obesity problem and related issues (here and here) previously but I am not sure how much a difference it makes. Of course my voice doesn’t account or matter much, but the institutes and government sources that are the source of this data are heard by all, but I am afraid are not really listened to.

While all the government reports appear to do nothing to change our behavior, on the other hand a change in peoples wallets does appear to change behavior according to some new data.

The good news is that Americans drove 9.6 billion fewer miles this May compared to a year ago. According to futurepundit (read his complete piece) this translates into a 3.7% decline. Suggesting that people are telecomuting, taking the bus, train, or bike according to the news reports and public mass transit data (of course the government has to worry now about the reduced taxes collected). This would go along with my piece suggesting one possible good outcome of the rising cost of gasoline will be more people will choose to bike to work, which may reduce obesity and increase fitness.

So it appears that the bottom line financial reality is enough to get people to change their habits (they had no choice), but not a continuing growing waistline and all the subsequent health complications.

I will try to reduce my reporting of the negative health data since it does not really appear to influence the people that need to change and instead try to cover more positive data of the potential health benefits the occur when people do change.

Jul 28

Life Expectancy at birth (years)Life expectancy:

Image via Wikipedia

Another sign of the growing health problems of developed countries is the rapid increase of ‘adult pill’ use by kids as reported by NY times. Previously, I had covered the new guidelines of use of anti-cholesterol medication in kids as young as 8, and potential long term harm this could result in.

In America, there has been a 151 % increase of type II diabetes drugs prescribed for children from 2001 to 2007. What is driving this increase drug requirements of children - no surprise that it is obesity (covered here and here). There is also a 137 % increase in acid reflux use (increased in the obese situation), and a smaller increase in high blood pressure (18 %) and cholesterol lowering drugs (12 %) in children during this same time period.

There has been several articles now suggesting that for America (just one example of a developed country) that for the first time the current generation of children might not live as long as their parents (Washington Post article as just one example). Researchers are forecasting a 2-5 year drop in life expectancy for the current generation. And if you don’t think this can happen in our modern times to a developed country one just has to look at Russia.

This potential drop in predicted lifespan in the children of today mainly due to obesity is a serious problem. The next question then becomes is giving pills to our children the answer? Is this going to solve the problem, or just put a bandaid on the problem.

Zemanta Pixie

Jul 26
BOURNEMOUTH, UNITED KINGDOM - (FILE) Mark Boyl...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Yesterday, I posted a piece about research that indicates that walking speed is a good predictor for mortality in 70-79 year old (original research paper). I then challenged people to see if they could walk as fast as the those people in their 70s.

“Now most of you reading this are not in their 70s but I challenge you to go walk 400m, or might as well make it a mile (4 laps around a track - close enough) and time yourself. Can you walk as fast as the fastest group of 70+ year olds which for a mile would equate to 14 min and 4 sec to 17 min and 16 sec ? I am betting most of you will not walk it in under 14 min and 4 seconds. But I am also hoping I am wrong :)

I took up my own challenge and my first lap time for the 400m walk was 2 min 57 sec, and my total time for the mile was 11 min 55 sec - which translates to 5 miles per hour (assuming it would only take me 5 seconds to travel another 9 meters to make up exactly a mile). Nothing to be proud of but yes I was able to beat the fastest 70 year old (14 min 4 sec). What about you? Also it will be interesting to see how much my walking speed decreases as I age.

JB had a comment that he thought the finding of walking speed correlation with mortality could be related to lean muscle mass as pointed out at the Arthur De Vaney website. I would agree with this possibility, but it is not dead easy to get accurate readings of your overall lean body mass. While on the other hand it is easy and cheap to test your walking speed.

So go out there and enjoy the weekend, but if you get a chance try to walk a timed and accurately measured mile (4 laps around track) and report back.

Zemanta Pixie

« Previous Entries